Homepage
title is self-explanatory.

Tags: alig
From 1969, but still very relavent today. Noam Chomsky debates William F. Buckley. Part 2 is here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Samvw6Z08 Who is Noam Chomsky? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky Who is William F. Buckley? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F_Buckley

Tags: Noam Chomsky Buckley debate 1969 terrorism terrorist Iraq Bush
In 1971, American linguist/social activist Noam Chomsky squared off against French philosopher Michel Foucault on Dutch television ... the program was entitled 'Human Nature: Justice Vs. Power' and offered sharp contrasts between the more traditional view of 'human nature' and what would become a postmodernist perspective ... Chomsky, following a rationalist lineage going back to at least Plato, believes that there is a foundational 'nature' and that its positive aspects (love, creativity, recognizing and embracing justice) must be realized, while Foucault remains skeptical of any such notion... for him, the issue is not so much whether 'justice' or 'human nature' 'exists,' but how they have historically (and currently) function in society ... in regard to justice, he says (this is not included in the clips): "... the idea of justice in itself is an idea which in effect has been invented and put to work in different types of societies as an instrument of a certain political and economic power or as a weapon against that power..." The point of any political struggle, for Foucault, is to alter the 'power relations' in which we all find ourselves ...

Tags: Michel Foucault Noam Chomsky Justice Power French Philosophy Postmodernism
Noam Chomsky, Professor, Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT / Author, "Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance" [Metropolitan Books]

Tags: charlie_rose tvshow charlie_rose_archive
A quick explanation of American politics.

Tags: USA Noam Chomsky Bush Politics
http://www.mediaed.org Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky demolish one of the central tenets of our political culture, the idea of the "liberal media." Instead, utilizing a systematic model based on massive empirical research, they reveal the manner in which the news media are so subordinated to corporate and conservative interests that their function can only be described as that of "elite propaganda."

Tags: MEF Media Education Literacy Critical Mass Industry Educational Sut Jhally Noam Chomsky Edward Herman Liberal Politics
For the past forty years Noam Chomsky's writings on politics and language have established him as a preeminent public intellectual and as one of the most original and wide-ranging political and social critics of our time. Among the seminal figures in linguistic theory over the past century, since the 1960s Chomsky has also secured a place as perhaps the leading dissident voice in the United States. Noam Chomsky is Institute Professor emeritus of linguistics at MIT and the author of numerous books including Chomsky vs. Foucault: A Debate on Human Nature, On Language, Objectivity and Liberal Scholarship, and Towards a New Cold War (all published by The New Press). He lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts. This event took place on April 22, 2008 at the Google Cambridge office, as a part of the Authors@Google series.

Tags: Universal Grammar internet media propaganda Manufacturing Consent 1960's
More at http://therealnews.com Are assumptions about Iran wrong? Monday November 19th, 2007

Tags: commentary analysis news realnews therealnews noam chomsky iran paul jay
Noam Chomsky on public opinion, public policy, masochist streaks, elections, NPR, Barack Obama, war in Iraq, Iran, Bolivia etc.

Tags: Noam Chomsky public opinion Barack Obama president elections Hugo Chavez Morales Bolivia wildlife
read excerpt here: http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2006/09/chomsky.html Link to the book: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0805076883/ref=nosim/representativ-20 Noam Chomsky's book Hegemony or Survival Chavez Cites Chomsky at UN General Assembly Almost all MSM avoided reporting Chavez's Chomsky book recommendation. Madame President, excellencies, heads of state, heads of government, high representatives of the governments of the world, good morning to all of you. First of all, I would like to invite you, very respectfully, to those who have not read this book, to read it. Noam Chomsky, one of the most prestigious American and world intellectuals. Noam Chomsky. And this is one of his most recent books, "Hegemony or Survival." "Hegemony or Survival: The Imperialist Strategy of the United States." It's an excellent book to help us understand what has been happening in the world throughout the 20th century, and what's happening now, and the greatest threat looming over our planet. The hegemonic pretensions of the American empire are placing at risk the very survival of the human species. We continue to warn you about this danger and we appeal to the people of the United States and the world to halt this threat, which is like a sword hanging over our heads. I had considered reading from this book, but, for the sake of time I will just leave it as a recommendation. It reads easily, it is a very good book, I'm sure Madame [President] you are familiar with it. It appears in English, in Russian, in Arabic, in German. I think that the first people who should read this book are our brothers and sisters in the United States, because their threat is right in their own house. - from transcript Hugo Chavez at the UN

Tags: Chavez Chomsky UN General Assembly Hugo Hegemony Survival
A simple Chomsky interview. Title is self-explanatory.

Tags: Capital Capitalism Slavery Wage Society Noam Chomsky
From 1969, but still very relavent today. Noam Chomsky debates William F. Buckley. Part 1 is here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYlMEVTa-PI Who is Noam Chomsky? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky Who is William F. Buckley? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F_Buckley

Tags: Noam Chomsky Buckley debate 1969 terrorism terrorist Iraq Bush
Noam Chomsky begins a small group discussion on Anarchism at Hamilton, Ontario's McMaster University. Filmed by Dundas Independent Video Association DIVA http://dundastards.blogspot.com (c)2002

Tags: Noam Chomsky Anarchism
An excerpt from "Noam Chomsky: Manufacturing Consent" in which the MIT linguistics professor criticizes the issue of concision in the US media.

Tags: Noam Chomsky media concision propaganda Manufacturing Consent politics television Nightline controversy evidence
Two political super-powers go head to head in this 1969 debate

Tags: Politics Debate
Ali G talks to a the premier expert in the field of linguistics Chomsky.

Tags: ali-g language linguistics
Trabajo para asignatura Teoria y Técnicas de Negociación.

Tags: Ciencias del Trabajo
Noam Chomsky on the Samuel P. Huntington "clash of civilizations", Islam, and the West's relashionship to the most extreme Islamic state - Saudi Arabia, a "key ally", according to Tony Blair.

Tags: Noam Chomsky Samuel Huntington Islam Islamic 911 Tony Blair George Bush Iraq Saddam Edward Said Avaaz Activism Muslim
Subscribe to RepresentativePress to help the campaign: http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=representativepress See the facts about Lebanon, Israel, Gaza Hezbollah and the Palestinians http://www.representativepress.org/ Noam Chomsky reveals facts like the abduction of the two Gaza civilians June 24, BEFORE the Israeli soldiers were captured. Learn the background that the mainstream media doesn't report. Help get the word out http://www.representativepress.org/ http://representativepress.blogspot.com/ http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2005/10/you-quoted-joseph-farahs-vile-lie.html Read some background about the conflict: http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2006/07/solution-has-to-acknowledge-what-has.html As early as 1924 these sick racist Zionists killed Jews because they stood in the way of their racist plan. http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2006/01/hostility-and-cruelty-as-early-as-1891.html

Tags: Lebanon Israel Gaza Hamas Hezbollah Chomsky
Are assumptions about Iran wrong? NOAM CHOMSKY, PROFESSOR OF LINGUISTICS, MIT: Well, if I can make a comment about the stated reasons, the very fact that we're discussing them tells us a lot about the sort of intellectual culture and moral culture in the United States. I mean, suppose it was true that Iran is helping insurgents in Iraq. I mean, wasn't the United States helping insurgents when the Russians invaded Afghanistan? Did we think there was anything wrong with that? I mean, Iraq's a country that was invaded and is under military occupation. You can't have a serious discussion about whether someone else is interfering in it. The basic assumption underlying the discussion is that we own the world. So if we invade and occupy another country, then it's a criminal act for anyone to interfere with it. What about the nuclear weapons? I mean, are there countries with nuclear weapons in the region? Israel has a couple of hundred nuclear weapons. The United States gives more support to it than any other country in the world. The Bush administration is trying very hard to push through an agreement that not only authorizes India's illegal acquisition of nuclear weapons but assists it. That's what the U.S.-Indo Nuclear Pact is about. And, furthermore, there happens to be an obligation of the states in the Security Council and elsewhere to move towards establishing a nuclear weapons-free zone in the region. Now that would include Iran and Israel and any U.S. forces deployed there. That's part of Resolution 687. Now to your question. The real reasons for the attack on Iran, the sanctions, and so on go back into history. I mean, we like to forget the history; Iranians don't. In 1953, the United States and Britain overthrew the parliamentary government and installed a brutal dictator, the Shah, who ruled until 1979. And during his rule, incidentally, the United States was strongly supporting the same programs they're objecting to today. In 1979, the population overthrew the dictator, and since then the United States has been essentially torturing Iran. First it tried a military coup. Then it supported Saddam Hussein during Iraq's invasion of Iran, which killed hundreds of thousands of people. Then, after that was over, the United States started imposing harsh sanctions on Iran. And now it's escalating that. The point is: Iran is out of control. You know, it's supposed to be a U.S.-client state, as it was under the Shah, and it's refusing to play that role.

Tags: Iran Chomsky Iranian Policy Nuclear USA US United States Insurgents Iraq War
Pages:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Sponsors