Once we hear bbc news we listen to some sides of the story,in aljazeerah we can hear to the whole story,barazan was lecturing in the court,the judge seems he did not do enough homework,all the structure of iraqi intellegence was new to the judge as well as the atterney,many things they did not know,if they would have known that beforehand,they would not charge barazan,so they are empty handed,barazan has quastioned the wittnesses which they ought to be against saddam,and all their answers were pro saddam and pro barazan,by the end taha yaseen ramadan exclaimed about wittnesses brought by force,accused were forced to attened,lawyers were kicked out,and the court has no legacy whatever,all that was brought up in aljazeerah,while bbc brought some.
Tags: justice aljazeerah bbc stricke saddam barazan intellegence court legacy hunger
